Charting Man Dan Explains Tightening Patterns and Risk-Reward Scenarios

[Intro music]
James West: Hey, Charting Man Dan joins me now from Dan, how are you today? Dan McDermitt: Wonderful, James, how are you
doing? James West: Yeah, I’m great. It’s good to see you. Dan McDermitt: You as well. James West: Okay, so let’s, today, let’s
talk a bit about some of the tradeable patterns that technical analysis yields to people like
you who have developed expertise in what can only be described as acute pattern recognition. So tell me about some of the patterns you’re
seeing today in some of the stocks, and rather than just dive in straight technically what’s
happened, tell us what it is about the pattern generally that you like. Dan McDermitt: Absolutely. So a consistent pattern that we see in the
market is, after periods of large volatility, the market will generally give us tightening
ranges as it’s a bit of price discovery. So if we see, you know, a 10 percent move,
we usually get tighter and tighter and tighter, and we look for these tightening patterns,
because when they break, they get a spike in volatility again. So it’s almost like going from a period
of volatile action, to calming down, reaching an equilibrium of a really tight range, and
then we get a volume and volatility spike, and that’s a trading opportunity that we
jump on. So while we don’t know which direction those
patterns are going to break, we look for the signals, and we’ll talk a little bit with
some examples here in just a moment of how we establish trade game plans based off of
support and resistance levels, and how to act on those. James West: Okay, how do you allocate odds,
or risk, in terms of – so, when you see a tightening pattern, do you say, do you try
to establish a scenario in your head where you say, OK, there’s a 70 percent chance
that this is going in the direction I think it’s going to, with a 30 percent chance
that I’m completely wrong, in which case I hedge my bets with stop losses. Is that kind of part of your process at all? Dan McDermitt: Yep, absolutely. So just want to differentiate: risk to reward
would be a little bit different than the odds of a break, and I’ll distinguish between
the two. The odds of a break, we’re going to be looking
at individual little pieces of the puzzle, whether that’s volume or indicators like
RSI or information like what the preceding trend was doing, and even fundamentally, you
know, how the sector is reacting. Maybe we had some bullish reaction in earnings
from someone else in the sector, something along those lines; these are all little pieces
in the puzzle that have slight shifts in the percentage odds of which direction we’re
going to break, or how confident we are in the pattern – and I’m certainly more confident
in some patterns than in others. Now, risk to reward is when we’re looking
at what is our risk before we get stopped out of the trade, and what is the potential
for upside that we could see if we get the follow-through? So I have an example where we’ll look at
risk-to-reward for a specific trade here in just a second, but they’re a little bit
different in terms of one is based off of support and resistance levels, and the other
is based off of pretty much a library of historical information in my brain. So if I’ve looked at 50,000 charts in my
life, I’ve seen these patterns play out many, many times, and if you have a good memory,
you start to develop, you know, what is most likely to happen in different scenarios, because
you’ve seen it before. James West: Hmm, yes, you know, that’s interesting. I had a good memory when I was, till I was
about 42, and then it really started to go south, and it’s not because I, you know,
I actually drink incrementally less than I ever have, I certainly don’t really care
to smoke too much cannabis anymore, so it’s like, I guess it’s just one of those age
things, but I’ve noticed that my ability to retain pattern recognition signals has
diminished with age. So you’ve got 50,000 patterns or charts
that you’ve seen in your head – that’s great, Dan, but I’m lucky if I can remember
five at this point. Dan McDermitt: So you’re saying that in
a decade, I’m going to be out of a career? James West: Well, I just think that you’re
going to have to rely more on your charm and good looks more so than your memory. [laughter]
Dan McDermitt: All right. James West: Okay, so Dan, let’s talk a bit
about that. Why don’t we go to the charts now, and you
tell me exactly what you’re talking about. Dan McDermitt: So as always, we want to know
what the broader market is doing; first things first. And we can see that over the last seven days,
we have seen a higher low on the S&P500 every single day. So that’s obviously a very strong trend;
we are at the 2019 highs, and we zoom out to the weekly time frame and look at the bounce
that has taken place. And again, it’s pretty flabbergasting at
this point, but we’re looking at all-time highs, and we are less than 2 percent away
from those all-time highs. So we know that any price action that has
happened in the Canadian or US marijuana space in the last three plus months, since the lows
of December, has been the ideal environment for bulls to trade in. Last time we were at all-time highs, the Canadian
MJ sector was running crazy, going blue-sky breakout. So we have to just preface everything knowing
that this is the ideal environment for bulls; it will not always be the case that this is,
you know, this strong of a bull market, but for now, that’s where we stand. So going back to what we were talking about
just a bit ago in terms of risk to reward and basing entries off of support levels and
tightening ranges: so, a very common tightening range is the equilibrium pattern, which is
marked by higher lows and lower highs in a tightening range, and like I said, it comes
after periods of high volatility. So CVSI here, is CV Sciences; it’s a CBD
play in the US, and they just made a monster bull move, where the size of this move in
just a week and a half was almost a 50 percent move. So big-time move, and then we start to consolidate
in a tightening range. We have the high of the move, and the low
of initial consolidation. That is now our range; we bounce, and we anticipate
a lower high is going to form, because tightening ranges are most likely. Now, those little details that I talked about
in terms of what could change the percentage chance of what’s most likely to happen:
if, on this bounce, if we were seeing increasing, solid bull volume in line with the volume
on the original move-up, we could definitely see continuation. But because the bull volume is unimpressive,
and because we already know that the most likely scenario is a lower high, we look for
that to happen. So then as we pulled back, we head back to
our key support level, down at 5.50; that’s the low of the pullback. So yesterday, the low of the day hit 5.53,
and I made an entry into CVSI, as did some other members, based off of this support level. We know that we are fairly likely to hold
that 5.50 support, and when we were down testing that level, the RSI on the hourly timeframe
was oversold. So that tells me that in oversold conditions,
we’re more likely to hold a support level. So I made an initial entry in the low 5.60’s;
a little bit more patient traders would have made an entry in the 5.50s, but let’s just
say for example case here that we have an entry at 5.60 and a stop loss below 5.50. You’re risking about $0.11, $0.12 if you
were to get stopped out, and if we were wrong that the bounce is not going to take place,
and this is not a tightening pattern. So we’ll say a $0.12 risk, so what is the
reward for the trade? Well, we’re going to anticipate that if
this support holds, the bulls are going to bounce and form another lower high compared
to 6.21. In the end, we did get a tiny bit of follow-through
this morning, not significant, so a pretty unimpressive follow-through move after the
strong close yesterday, but even with that being the case, the entry from 5.60 would
have resulted in $0.30 of possible upside. So my risk is $0.12 and my reward is $0.30,
so that’s about a 2.5 to 1 reward-to-risk ratio, which I always want to have as a guideline,
a rule of thumb, 2:1 risk-to-reward. Because if I’m risking $0.12 and I’m only
looking to make $0.12, that’s not really the ideal kind of trade we want to be in. We want to be able to see moves that have
reward bigger than what the potential loss is. So another example of tightening ranges: here’s
CRON on the hourly time frame, and it’s just been tightening the last few days, and
we’re actually right at support right now, where we have our low of the pullback, high
of the bounce, higher low, lower high, and if we turn off extended hours that just makes
it a little bit cleaner, where it’s just a tightening range. We formed another higher low at 18.16; we
have a lower high at 18.53, so we can see three days in a row of lower highs, but we
also have the higher lows forming. And we did just break 18.16 support, but only
by a penny; so whenever we’re entering a trade, we want to ensure there are stop losses
allow for enough space for a couple cents of wiggle room at least, because right now,
if you’re making a trade based off of the 18.16 support, we’re seeing a tiny bounce
at this point. If we’re going to stay in this equilibrium
pattern, the bulls have to see a bounce back up to the 18.30s, and then we would look for
a break on Monday, because we get to a point where we get so tight that we can’t possibly
stay in the tightening pattern any longer. And right now, if we do close today or see
some bounce follow-through into the 18.30s, we will stay in this pattern into Monday. So it’s making an entry perhaps based on
support, or if things get really tight, I personally just wait for the break, because
the break usually sees a volume spike associated with it, and then direction and momentum. So I want to be profitable in a trade as soon
as I enter, so if I wait for these resistance levels to break on increasing bull volume,
that’s going to ensure that I am likely going to see a profitable trade and follow-through
as soon as I enter. So now we’re going to look at TLRY which
is in all-out dump mode, and we got plenty of red flags that we were going to be entering
an area with a lack of support after the exponential run-up from when we started trading, we’re
now falling back into that zone, and we did not establish many support levels on the way
up. I’m looking at 55.55 and then down to 49.50,
and you can see there’s all these gaps mixed in here and just an area where there’s a
lack of support. We can see RSI levels get overextended. So I love oversold bounces; it’s one of
my edges. I’ve had years of practice and I can see
from my statistics that I perform well in oversold bounces. I certainly do not suggest that newer traders
try and play oversold bounces without a lot of experience, because it’s a great way
to be playing counter-trend and to be stuck in positions without having any idea of when
to exit, and then that’s when things can get ugly. So for me, I’m going to be looking to begin
scaling into TLRY potentially starting next week, because the daily RSI is down in the
low 20s; the four-hour RSI is down in the low 20s; the hourly RSI, down in the low 20s,
and when we get a scenario with all these longer-term time frames lining up oversold,
we generally get a solid bounce. So whenever we do find a bottom, we’re going
to expect a 10 percent bounce off those lows just as a conservative rough number, but there’s
no sign that the bottom has been set yet. So personally, I scale into these trades,
and let’s say I make an entry on $59 support breaking; that’s one of three entries. I’ll then reserve a second entry for 57,
and then a third entry to 55, and if were to drop down towards 55 in the next two trading
days, RSI levels would be at all-time lows, and we would just be getting ready for that
short covering and bulls getting in for that quick oversold bounce. So again, certainly higher risk in terms of
not being an easy trade, playing counter the trend, but it is something that I’m watching
into next week, TLRY, and we’ll see if this bounce plays out. So those are some examples of using support
and resistance to establish some trade game plans to limit your risk and hopefully maximize
reward in these trades. Thanks for having me on, James. I’ll see you next time. James West: All right, Dan, that was great. Thanks very much for joining us; as per usual,
your contribution is much appreciated. We’ll see you soon.

3 thoughts on “Charting Man Dan Explains Tightening Patterns and Risk-Reward Scenarios”

  1. The low key mastery of Dan's presentation may be as valid a psychological shift as any Jung, Fruede or any fancy name you want to throw.
    Not only is he good and smart.
    He literally loves you.
    It will be fun to watch voices dissappear as this new model asserts better pursuit

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *